THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT M. SCALLIET and RAYMOND R. RUTH _____________ Appeal No. 94-3184 Application 07/924,8281 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 5 and 6, all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 5 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 5. A composition for use as a fuel comprising: Application for patent filed August 4, 1992.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007