Ex parte SCALLIET et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-3184                                                                
          Application 07/924,828                                                            


                     from about 3 to about 10% by weight water;                             
                     greater than about 35% by weight solids, said solids                   
                comprising inorganic solids and combustible organic solids                  
                that are insoluble in methylene chloride;                                   
                     from about 30 to about 70% by weight of liquid                         
                hydrocarbons, the composition having a minimum heat value of                
                at least about 7,000 BTU's per pound and viscosity such that                
                said composition is a pumpable fluid at ambient temperature,                
                said solids and said liquid hydrocarbons being obtained from                
                the same refinery waste stream containing liquid                            
                hydrocarbons, water and said solids whereby all of the heat                 
                value of said composition is derived from components                        
                initially present in said waste stream.                                     

                The references relied upon by the examiner are:                             

          Battista              4,358,292       Nov.  9, 1982                               
          Verhille              4,842,616       Jun. 27, 1989                               
          Chu                   5,141,526       Aug. 25, 1992                               

                The following rejections are at issue in this appeal:                       
                (1) Claim 5  is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first2                                                              
          paragraph, “written description requirement”;                                     
                (2) Claim 5  is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second3                                                              
          paragraph;                                                                        


            Claim 6 has not been rejected by the examiner.  However, since claim 62                                                                           
          depends from claim 5, it properly should have been included in this rejection.    
          See 37 CFR § 1.75(c). The omission of claim 6 from the rejection appears to have  
          been an oversight by the examiner. Nevertheless, in any subsequent prosecution, a 
          rejection of claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, should also include  
          dependent claim 6.                                                                
            See footnote 2.3                                                                           
                                             2                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007