Appeal No. 94-3399
Application 07/871,374
(1) Claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as lacking descriptive support for the invention as
is now claimed in the original disclosure; and
(2) Claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicants
regard as their invention.
OPINION
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and appellants in support of their respective
positions, reference is made to appellants' brief and to the
examiner's answer for the full exposition thereof. For the
reasons set forth below, we affirm the rejection of claim 2
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, but reverse the
remaining rejections of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first and second paragraphs.
REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112, FIRST PARAGRAPH
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007