Ex parte LYONS - Page 10




          Appeal No. 94-3399                                                           
          Application 07/871,374                                                       


                                  ANCILLARY REQUEST                                    
               As a final point, we note that appellants have requested                
          the Board to direct the examiner for reconsideration and entry               
          of the amendments filed after final rejection.  See Brief,                   
          page 3.  However, an examiner's refusal to enter the                         
          amendments filed after final rejection is petitionable to the                
          Commissioner and not appealable to this Board.  See In re                    
          Hengehold, 440 F.2d 1395, 1403, 169 USPQ 473, 479 (CCPA 1971);               
          MPEP Chapter 1000.                                                           


                                      CONCLUSION                                       


               In summary, we conclude that:                                           
               (1) The rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 12 under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed;                                  
               (2) The rejection of claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                     
          first paragraph, is affirmed; and                                            
               (2) The rejection of claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 112, second paragraph, is reversed.                                        
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                       


                                          10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007