Appeal No. 94-3399 Application 07/871,374 ANCILLARY REQUEST As a final point, we note that appellants have requested the Board to direct the examiner for reconsideration and entry of the amendments filed after final rejection. See Brief, page 3. However, an examiner's refusal to enter the amendments filed after final rejection is petitionable to the Commissioner and not appealable to this Board. See In re Hengehold, 440 F.2d 1395, 1403, 169 USPQ 473, 479 (CCPA 1971); MPEP Chapter 1000. CONCLUSION In summary, we conclude that: (1) The rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed; (2) The rejection of claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is affirmed; and (2) The rejection of claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is reversed. The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007