THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ELIZABETH PUI-LU CHANG
____________
Appeal No. 95-0015
Application No. 07/869,6941
____________
HEARD: September 17, 1997
____________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH, and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-
3, 5, 6 and 8-17. Claim 4 has been canceled. Claims 7 and 18
stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim.
Claim 1 is illustrative and is appended to this decision.
1Application for patent filed April 16, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007