Appeal No. 95-1296
Application 08/073,257
defining a face which is mathematically related to said
first datum in three dimensional space;
selecting a type of tolerance between a geometric element
of said object and a face; and
selecting a tolerance;
storing the mathematical description of a first datum;
storing the type of tolerance and the selected tolerance;
and
linking the face, the mathematical description of the
first datum, and the type of tolerance and selected tolerance in
the storage means of the computer.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Fitzgerald, Jr. et al. 4,855,939 Aug. 08, 1989
(Fitzgerald)
Claims 10, 12-16, 21-26 and 29-33 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers
Fitzgerald taken alone.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007