Appeal No. 95-1296
Application 08/073,257
relationship between these values and the tolerance value are not
suggested by Fitzgerald for the same reasons discussed above with
respect to the linking step. Therefore, we do not sustain the
rejection of claims 21, 16 and 22-26.
With respect to independent claim 29, the same linking
features as discussed above are recited. Therefore, we also do
not sustain the rejection of claims 29-33.
In summary, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims
10, 12-16, 21-26 and 29-33 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Roy W. Truelson
IBM Corporation
Department 917
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007