Ex parte PARIS et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                        Paper No. 31                          

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                               Ex parte DOMINIQUE PARIS, JEAN-MAXIME NIGRETTO,                                                                
                             BRUNO BONNEMAIN, DOMINIQUE MEYER and DIDIER DOUCET                                                               
                                                        Appeal No. 95-1798                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/397,4151                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before WINTERS, CAROFF and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative                                                                   
                Patent Judges.                                                                                                                
                WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This appeal was taken from the examiner’s decision rejecting                                                         
                claims 2 through 7, 10 through 12 and 14 through 18.  Claim 9,                                                                
                which is the only other claim remaining in the application,                                                                   
                stands objected to as depending from a rejected base claim.  As                                                               
                stated in the Final Rejection mailed March 29, 1993 (Paper No.                                                                

                         1Application for patent filed September 21, 1989.                                                                    

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007