THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DOMINIQUE PARIS, JEAN-MAXIME NIGRETTO,
BRUNO BONNEMAIN, DOMINIQUE MEYER and DIDIER DOUCET
________________
Appeal No. 95-1798
Application 07/397,4151
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, CAROFF and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner’s decision rejecting
claims 2 through 7, 10 through 12 and 14 through 18. Claim 9,
which is the only other claim remaining in the application,
stands objected to as depending from a rejected base claim. As
stated in the Final Rejection mailed March 29, 1993 (Paper No.
1Application for patent filed September 21, 1989.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007