Ex parte PARIS et al. - Page 9

          Appeal No. 95-1798                                                           
          Application 07/397,415                                                       


                                      CONCLUSION                                       
               In conclusion, we do not sustain the examiner’s non-prior               
          art or prior art rejections.  Accordingly, the examiner’s                    
          decision rejecting claims 2 through 7, 10 through 12 and 14                  
          through 18 is reversed.                                                      
                                       REVERSED                                        


                         SHERMAN D. WINTERS             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         MARC L. CAROFF                 ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )   APPEALS AND                
                                                        )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         WILLIAM F. SMITH               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
















                                         -9-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007