Appeal No. 95-1955
Application 08/109,982
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 10-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as being without adequate written description support
in the specification is reversed.
The rejection of claims 10-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, as being indefinite or failing to particularly point
out and distinctly claim that subject matter which the applicant
regards as her invention is reversed.
The rejection of claims 10-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Nibby and Hill is reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-15-
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007