Paper No. 18
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte GIANG T. DAO
______________
Appeal No. 95-3017
Application 07/952,0611
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 to 12, and 15 to 31.
Pages 4 and 5 of the final rejection indicate that claims
13 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon rejected base
claims but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form
Application for patent filed September 25, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007