THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEPHEN R. LAWTON
and GEORGE H. WARFEL, JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3031
Application 08/057,2061
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-31, all the claims pending in the
application.
The invention pertains to a system for processing a form. Claim 5 is illustrative and reads
as follows:
1Application for patent filed May 3, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/753,175, filed August 30, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007