THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MANFRED BORGER and HEINER EMONTS
________________
Appeal No. 95-3096
Application 08/139,0721
________________
HEARD: September 16, 1997
________________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4
and 5. The examiner has indicated that claims 2 and 6, the other
claims remaining in the application, would be allowable if
rewritten in independent form.
Claim 5 is representative of the subject matter involved:
1Application for patent filed October 21, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/959,539, filed October 13, 1992, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/758,123, filed September 12, 1991,
now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007