Appeal No. 95-3096
Application 08/139,072
in question would obviously be avoided by plugging the braided
lead onto the Boaz connector 18 before soldering the Boaz
terminal to the conductor on the window.
Appellants also argue in their reply brief (page 1) that
Boaz does not disclose a brazed connection between the connecting
piece and braid, however, claim 5 does not recite a brazed
connection.
Accordingly, the rejection of claim 5 will be sustained.
Since appellants state on page 6 of their brief that claims 1, 4
and 5 stand or fall together, the rejections of claims 1 and 4
will also be sustained.
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 4 and 5 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connec-
tion with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007