THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 48
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAN-IVAR ARVIDSSON
__________
Appeal No. 95-3114
Application 08/051,8001
__________
HEARD: December 8, 1997
__________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,
4, 6, 7, 10 to 12, 15 to 17, 20 to 22, 25 and 26, and from the
rejection of claims 3, 5, 8, 9, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23 and 24 in the
Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 33). No claim is
allowed.
1Application for patent filed April 26, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/634,131 filed January 4, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007