Appeal No. 95-3140 Application No. 08/058,453 THE REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103 The burden of establishing a basis for denying patentability to a claimed invention rests upon the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, it is incumbent upon the examiner to establish a factual basis to support the legal conclusion of obviousness and to provide a reason why one having ordinary skill in the art would have been led to modify the prior art reference to arrive at the claimed invention. The requisite motivation must stem from some teaching, suggestion or inference in the prior art as a whole or knowledge generally available to one having ordinary skill in the art. In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Sole independent claim 1 requires that the concrete being tested have unknown water and cement proportions, that a difference magnitude related to a difference between (1) a first value related to a reflection coefficient for a concrete sample having known water and cement portions and (2) a second value related to a reflection coefficient based upon at least said reflected microwave signal from the concrete being tested 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007