Appeal No. 95-3916 Application 08/008,292 data portions (i.e., the data words of first and second blocks), and not check information codes as recited in all of the claims on appeal. The obviousness rejection of claims 26 through 28 and 30 through 36 is reversed because the secondary reference to Takagi does not cure this shortcoming in the teachings of Preissler. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007