Ex parte NIWA - Page 1




                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                   
               was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                  
               binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                  
                                                                                          Paper No. 26                          

                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                      _____________                                                             

                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      _____________                                                             
                                              Ex parte TOMOMITSU NIWA                                                           
                                                      _____________                                                             
                                                  Appeal No. 95-4325                                                            
                                              Application 08/006,9571                                                           
                                                     ______________                                                             
                                                HEARD: JULY 15, 1997                                                            
                                                    _______________                                                             
               Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and FLEMING, Administrative Patent                                                       
               Judges.                                                                                                          
               FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                      This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                  
               claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 18.  Claim 4 has been canceled.                                                 
               On September 2, 1994, Appellant filed an after final amendment                                                   
               canceling claim 15, adding new claim 19 and amending claims 6 and                                                


                      1Application for patent filed January 21, 1993.                                                           
                                                               1                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007