Appeal No. 95-4544
Application 07/975,905
permit transmission of electrical signals corresponding with said file
editing operations therebetween;
wherein said plurality of users are permitted to concurrently view
said given computer file and, subject to practical system limitations,
said computer file display means, multi-tasking processing means and
interconnecting means operate so that said file editing operations and
said corresponding limited data transfer to said display means occur on
a substantially real-time basis relative to said edit inputs to permit
said plurality of users at said different remote locations to review
with their respective display means said edits made to said given
computer file substantially contemporaneously with the corresponding
input of said edits and execution of said file editing operations.
The Examiner relies on the following reference:
Jakobs et al. (Jakobs) 5,300,943 Apr. 5, 1994
(effective filing date Oct. 3, 1986)
Claims 1 through 11, 13 through 15, 17, 23, and 25 through
28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Jakobs .2
2We note that in the Examiner's answer, the Examiner
withdrew the rejection of claims 1 through 11, 13 through 15, 17
through 23, 25, and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Bly and Kaufman and set forth this rejection as
a new ground of rejection.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007