Appeal No. 95-4544 Application 07/975,905 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). "Obviousness may not be established using hindsight or in view of the teachings or suggestions of the inventor." Para-Ordnance Mfg., supra. We note that the remaining claims set forth these limitations as discussed for claim 1. Therefore, we have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 11, 13 through 15, 17, 23 and 25 through 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007