Ex parte BAAS - Page 1

                                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                             
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                    
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                      
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                    
                                                                                                            Paper No. 18                      

                                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                         Ex parte DIETER BAAS                                                                 
                                                           Appeal No. 95-4547                                                                 
                                                       Application 08/097,6971                                                                
                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                   

                Before KRASS, MARTIN, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           
                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                 
                                 This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                     
                claims 1 through 18, all of the claims pending in the application.                                                            
                                 The invention is directed to an optical                                                                      
                recording/reproducing apparatus having servo compensation for                                                                 
                detected defects and external shocks.  More particularly, tracking                                                            
                control signals are continuously sampled at intervals around a                                                                

                                 1Application for patent filed July 27, 1993.  According                                                      
                to appellant, this application is a National stage application under                                                          
                35 U.S.C.  371 of PCT/EP92/00229 filed February 4, 1992.                                                                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007