THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DIETER BAAS
__________
Appeal No. 95-4547
Application 08/097,6971
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 18, all of the claims pending in the application.
The invention is directed to an optical
recording/reproducing apparatus having servo compensation for
detected defects and external shocks. More particularly, tracking
control signals are continuously sampled at intervals around a
1Application for patent filed July 27, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a National stage application under
35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP92/00229 filed February 4, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007