Ex parte BAAS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4547                                                          
          Application No. 08/097,697                                                  


          compact disc and samples of the tracking control signal for at least        
          the last 360 degrees of tracking are stored in memory.  When a              
          disturbance or defect is detected, the stored tracking signal is            
          substituted for the real time tracking signal.                              
                    Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                     
                    1. In a data recovery apparatus having a light beam which         
          is focused onto a rotating recording medium by a regulation circuit         
          and is guided along data tracks of the rotating recording medium by a       
          tracking regulation circuit, where a regulating signal of a                 
          regulation circuit is stored in a memory and the regulating signal          
          present in the memory is applied to an actuator of the regulation           
          circuit for the duration of a disturbance, improvements comprising:         
                    means for successively storing regulating signal values, at       
          predetermined intervals, in memory for at least the last most prior         
          one rotation of the rotating recording medium;                              
                    means for detecting mechanical shock incurred by the              
          apparatus; and                                                              
                    means for substituting the regulating signal stored in            
          memory for the regulating signal in response to detecting said              
          mechanical shock.                                                           

                    The examiner relies on the following references:                  

          Baba et al. (Baba)       4,703,468                Oct. 27, 1987             
          Ohtake et al. (Ohtake)   4,785,442                Nov. 15, 1988             
          Anderson et al.          5,241,443                Aug. 31, 1993             
          (Anderson)          (Effective filing date of Apr. 17, 1990)                

                    Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as       
          unpatentable over Ohtake in view of Anderson and Baba.                      


                                            2                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007