Ex parte HAAR et al. - Page 9




                 Appeal No. 95-4590                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/056,188                                                                                                                 



                 appellants, we do not see that the examiner has in any way                                                                             
                 relied upon impermissible hindsight in combining the applied                                                                           
                 references as stated above.                                                                                                            


                 From our perspective, the examiner has merely taken into                                                                               
                 account only knowledge which was within the level of ordinary                                                                          
                 skill at the time the claimed invention was made and has not                                                                           
                 relied upon knowledge gleaned only from appellants'                                                                                    
                 disclosure, thus, the reconstruction as stated above is                                                                                
                 proper.  See In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d 1392, 1395, 170 USPQ                                                                           
                 209, 212 (CCPA 1971).                                                                                                                  


                                   As for appellants' argument (brief, page 3) that                                                                     
                 none of the references applied by the examiner shows the                                                                               
                 grommet and ring structures specified by claim 21, we must                                                                             
                 agree with the examiner that appellants have not used the term                                                                         
                 "grommets" in its normal sense.  By definition  a "grommet" is                     3                                                   
                 "1. a ring of rope or metal used to fasten the edge of a sail                                                                          


                          3  Webster’s New World Dictionary, 2nd College Edition,                                                                       
                 Prentiss Hall Press, 1986.                                                                                                             
                                                                           9                                                                            





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007