Appeal No. 95-4590
Application 08/056,188
On such a basis, we support the examiner's rejection of claim
23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore sustain that rejection.
To summarize, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 21, 22, 24 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Seasafe #4055 in view of Soubie and Hagert
is affirmed as to claims 21 and 26, but is reversed with
respect to claims 22 and 24. The decision of the examiner to
reject claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Seasafe #4055, Soubie,
Hagert and Eckert, and that to reject claim 27 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Seasafe #4055 in view of
Soubie are each affirmed. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), a
new rejection of claim 24 has been entered by this panel of
the Board under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
Any request for reconsideration or modification of
this decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
16
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007