Appeal No. 95-4636 Application 08/027,868 that regard, we reject the appellants' argument: "While it is true that the Crowdis patent also teaches the similar function, the caller ID number is retrieved through the FPGA circuitry in Applicants' data terminal." The appellants have not shown where in any rejected claim is the requirement that the caller ID number is retrieved through the FPGA circuitry. What Butler clearly does not disclose is the claimed field programmable gate array (FPGA) which receives a plurality of control signals, address signals, data signals, and sensed signals from around the data terminal, and provides a plurality of gated outputs. Moreover, according to claim 6, the UART must be connected to an 8-bit data bus which connects to the plural gated output digital ports from the field programmable gate array. With regard to the "FPGA" feature of the invention, the examiner states (answer at 5): FPGAs are again well known in the art for allowing the user to program an integrated circuit to a specific need such as generation of complex logic functions as an alternative to more expensive applications specific integrated circuits. The number and order of FPGAs, and the number of resident logic gates is apparently an obvious matter [of] design that will depend on the [a] system requirement. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007