Appeal No. 95-5030 Application 07/815,694 discussing its Figure 3B, Sakon states (at 8): It can be seen from this figure that regardless of the specific data input unit, the input data are appended with the order numbers according to the input order. . . . Figure 3(C) illustrates the state after reading of the data with order number 1 by means of data input unit (10). In this case, the data of data input unit (2) are made up of data "8" with order number 2 and data "5" with order number 4, while the others are determined to be unchanged. With regard to conventional systems, Sakon describes that the actual order of input is ignored (page 8, lines 21-26). According to Sakon, its disclosed method avoids the problem (page 8, line 27). The "1," "2," and "3" designations in the first column of the tables shown in Figures 3B and 3C of Sakon indicate the corresponding input device numbers, not different levels of priority. Note that in Figure 3B, the first item actually served is the item "2" from input device number 2 because it is first in the overall order of receipt. The designation beneath the data "2" shows that that element is first or "1" in the order of receipt. The examiner is erroneous in finding that Sakon "does NOT 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007