Appeal No. 95-5030
Application 07/815,694
Except for independent claims 1 and 25, each of the claims
on appeal, in our view, includes at least one limitation or claim
feature which is not disclosed, either expressly, inherently, or
implicitly, by Sakon. We point out this feature specifically
with respect to claim 2, claim 17, and claim 26, and simply note
that all other claims on appeal, aside from independent claims 1
and 25, depend ultimately from one of claims 2, 17 and 26 and
thus include the feature which we find missing in Sakon.
Claim 2 depends from independent claim 1 and further
requires the information relating to the data to be transferred
to include information for "designating a priority" for the data
ready to transfer, and specifies that the order of receipt is an
order of receipt "within a given priority."
Claim 17 is an independent claim and recites that the
information relating to the data for transfer includes
information for "designating a priority" for the data ready for
transfer, and specifies a means for sending "for said
[designated] priority," the information in the order of receipt.
Claim 26 depends from independent claim 25 and further
requires the information relating to the data to be transferred
to include information for "designating a priority" for the data
9
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007