Ex parte KREIN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-5030                                                          
          Application 07/815,694                                                      


          circuit, said method comprising:                                            
                         sending a signal from a first device coupled to a            
          source of data to a second device which receives data from said             
          first device, said signal indicating that data is ready for                 
          transfer to said second device;                                             
                         storing information relating to said data, said              
          information including information indicating the order in which             
          the information was received by the control circuit;                        
                         incrementing the information indicating the order            
          in which the information was received by the control circuit; and           
                         sending data to said second device in the order of           
          receipt by the control circuit.                                             

               Claim 1 further recites a plurality of buffers for storing             
          the information relating to the data for transfer, and claim 17             
          further recites that the information stored in the plurality of             
          buffers include information for designating a priority for the              
          data ready for transfer.                                                    
               Note that claims 2, 17 and 26 have been amended in a paper             
          concurrently filed with the appellants' reply brief.                        

                                       Opinion                                        
               We do not sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 1-30             
          over Fava and Miro.                                                         
               We sustain the rejection of claims 1 and 25 as being                   
          anticipated by Sakon.                                                       
               We do not sustain the rejection of claims 2-24 and 26-30 as            
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007