Ex parte SAMEER H. ELDIN et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 95-5080                                                           
          Application 07/952,122                                                       


          1456, 1460, 223 USPQ 1260, 1263 (Fed.Cir. 1984); In re Piasecki,             
          745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                     
          However, this evidence of nonobviousness in our view is                      
































                                          10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007