Appeal No. 96-0308 Application No. 07/854,192 variety of products. According to the examiner, it would have been obvious to use Kondo’s card on a variety of products. Examiner’s Answer at 4. Appellants argue that using Kondo’s card on a variety of products does not equate to a reusable, recordable product label. Appeal Brief at 19, lines 9-10. We agree with Appellants. Claim 19 recites a number of steps relating to reusing a recordable product label. In the first four steps, a label bearing a recorder is secured to a first product, a message concerning the first product is recorded in the label, and the message is played. In the fifth step, the label is released from the first product and attached to a second product. In the sixth and seventh steps, the first message is erased and a message regarding the second product is recorded. In the eighth step, the second message is played. Tarlow teaches securing a playback module to a variety of products. Page 3, line 33, through page 4, line 2. However, Kondo wires a recordable label into each greeting card, so there is no need to reuse the label in a different card. The examiner identifies no rationale for removing Kondo’s label from one card 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007