THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER LARIVIERE
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0324
Application 08/045,7471
______________
HEARD: June 5, 1997
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and HAIRSTON
and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed April 8, 1993. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of Applica-
tion 08/011,610, filed February 1, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007