Appeal No. 96-0553 Application 08/020,993 respective embodiments of Tanaka does not relate to respective corresponding blocks of preceding and current frames but only the current frame blocks or adjacent blocks therewithin. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 7 to 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed only as to claims 7, 16 to 18, 27 and 28. Therefore, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART GARY V. HARKCOM, Vice Chief ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) JAMES D. THOMAS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007