THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES V. CARTMELL, WAYNE R. STURTEVANT
and MICHAEL L. WOLF
________________
Appeal No. 96-0928
Application 08/310,9711
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application for patent filed September 23, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/862,456, filed April 2, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,429,589, issued
July 4, 1995.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007