Appeal No. 96-1349
Application 08/002,168
Claims 1-3 and 5-9 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Davidson taken alone.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner, the arguments in
support of the rejections and the evidence of obviousness relied
upon by the examiner as support for the obviousness rejection.
We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in
reaching our decision, the appellant's arguments set forth in the
brief along with the examiner's rationale in support of the
rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the examiner's
answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the disclosure in this application describes the claimed
invention in a manner which complies with the requirements of 35
U.S.C. § 112. We are also of the view that the evidence relied
upon and the level of skill in the particular art would not have
suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art the obviousness of
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007