THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WEI GAO and JOHN B. VANDER SANDE
__________
Appeal No. 96-1353
Application 07/696,9731
__________
HEARD: December 10, 1997
__________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1, 3 through 6, 8 through 55 and 57 through 89.
Claim 2 has been withdrawn from consideration as being directed
1Application for patent filed May 1, 1991. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/542,170 filed June 22, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007