Ex parte GAO et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1353                                                          
          Application 07/696,973                                                      


          to a non-elected invention, and claims 7 and 56 have been                   
          canceled.  No claims have been allowed.                                     
               The appellants’ invention is directed to a method for                  
          preparing an adherent superconducting oxide coating.  The subject           
          matter before us on appeal is illustrated by reference to claim             
          1, which reads as follows:                                                  
               1.   A method for preparing an adherent superconducting                
          oxide coating comprising:                                                   
               combining metallic elements of a superconducting oxide to              
          form an alloy;                                                              
               melting said alloy and maintaining said alloy in a molten              
          state;                                                                      
               melt writing with said molten alloy such that said molten              
          alloy is applied through an orifice to a surface of a substrate;            
               selectively varying process parameters so that the thickness           
          and width of said molten alloy can be controlled;                           
               moving said orifice and substrate with respect to one                  
          another so as to form a patterned precursor alloy; and                      
               oxidizing said patterned alloy to form said adherent                   
          superconducting oxide.                                                      
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          MacKay                        4,754,900           Jul.  5, 1988             
          Jasper, Jr. (Jasper)          4,820,688           Apr. 11, 1989             
          Ashok et al. (Ashok)          4,960,752           Oct.  2, 1990             
                                                  (filed Feb. 27, 1989)               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007