Ex parte LYLES et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 96-1692                                                          
          Application 08/156,811                                                      



                    the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 20                 
          and 21 under 35 U.S.C.  102(b) as being clearly anticipated by             
          either of Westmont or Lanius has also been reversed.                        


                                      REVERSED                                        




                         JAMES M. MEISTER             )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )   BOARD OF PATENT            
                         CHARLES E. FRANKFORT         )     APPEALS AND               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         LAWRENCE J. STAAB            )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               













                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007