Ex parte LYLES et al. - Page 11

          Appeal No. 96-1692                                                          
          Application 08/156,811                                                      



                    the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 20                 
          and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by             
          either of Westmont or Lanius has also been reversed.                        


                                      REVERSED                                        




                         JAMES M. MEISTER             )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )   BOARD OF PATENT            
                         CHARLES E. FRANKFORT         )     APPEALS AND               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         LAWRENCE J. STAAB            )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               













                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007