THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DIETER HUSAR, KARL BALDSZUN
and OLIVER BEER
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1812
Application 07/984,7621
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 25 through 34, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection and from the final rejection of claims 35 through
42. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for Patent filed December 3, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007