Ex parte HUSAR et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 96-1812                                                          
          Application No. 07/984,762                                                  


          examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                      
          determination which follow.                                                 


               We reverse the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims              
          under 35 USC §103.                                                          





               Each of independent claims 25 and 35 addresses a closure               
          vessel assembly for use in laboratory work within a range of                
          temperatures between -196°C and +100°C comprising, inter alia,              
          an annular sealing lip of a closure having a lip sealing                    
          surface and a convex sealing surface on the vessel, the lip                 
          sealing surface extends at an acute angle to a central axis of              
          the vessel and has an infinite radius of curvature and the                  
          convex sealing surface has a radius of about 1 mm.                          


               Our review of the applied teachings of Gerken and Korf                 

          one skilled in the art would reasonably have been expected to               
          draw from the disclosure.  See In re Preda 401 F.2d 825, 826,               
          159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).                                              

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007