Appeal No. 96-1812 Application No. 07/984,762 In the specification (page 4) and original claim 5, a radius of curvature of “about 1 mm” is set forth. On the other hand, the specification (page 10) also recites a radius of curvature of “1 mm”. In our view, the recitation of “about 1 mm” is indeterminate in meaning. The specification is silent as to what the modifying word of degree “about” denotes and, therefore, the scope of the term “about 1 mm” cannot be ascertained when the term is read in light of the specification. See Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 826, 221 USPQ 568, 573-574 (Fed. Cir. 1984). For purposes of the following new ground of rejection under 35 USC 103, we interpret the indefinite term “about 1 mm” in claims 25 and 35 as denoting --1 mm--. Claims 25 through 42 are rejected under 35 USC 103 as being unpatentable over Jessop and either Korf or the acknowledged prior art (appellants’ specification, page 1). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007