THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LYNN R. SKOW, ARTHUR R. MOORE
and WILLIAM M. DUNBAR
__________
Appeal No. 96-1883
Application 08/078,3801
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before LYDDANE, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 15, 17, 18, 22, 25, 28 through 32,
1Application for patent filed June 22, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/914,765 filed July 15, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007