Appeal No. 96-1996 Application 08/181,075 This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 12 through 27, which constitute all of the claims remaining of record in the application. The appellant's invention is directed to a member for blocking the closing of a sliding door, and to a method for doing so. The subject matter before us on appeal is illustrated by reference to claim 15, which reads as follows: 15. In a sliding closure assembly including a frame and a sliding closure member which is slidable in said frame between an open position and a closed position, the improvement comprising a child safety device which includes: a blocking member having two parallel opposed sides; and an attachment member comprising a strap having a width and opposed ends, said attachment member being attached to said blocking member at one of said opposed ends, the other of said opposed ends of said attachment member being attached to said frame, whereby as said sliding member is moved from said closed position to an open position, said blocking member is urged into an operable position between said sliding member and said frame so as to prevent said sliding member from being slid into said closed position. THE REFERENCES The references relied upon by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Hoopes, Jr. (Hoopes) 1,664,174 Mar. 27, 1928 Salerno 4,165,553 Aug. 28, 1979 Salvador et al. (Salvador) 5,369,840 Dec. 6, 1994 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007