THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ICHIRO KURAWAKI,
TOYOJI TANAKA
and KAZUMASA NAKAYA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2475
Application 08/319,4731
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed October 6, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/989,194, filed December 11, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/786,733, filed November 1,
1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007