Appeal No. 96-2475
Application 08/319,473
Ohma 2 112 877 July 27, 1983
(U.K. Patent Application)
Tanaka 3-136996 June 11, 1991
(Japan)
Kurawaki et al. (Kurawaki) 3-136994 June 11, 1991
(Japan)
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1 and 2 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(a) as being clearly anticipated by Tanaka.
Claims 1 and 2 through 15 also stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(a) as being clearly anticipated by Kurawaki.
Claims 16 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Tanaka in view of Ohma.
Claims 16 through 20 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Kurawaki in view of Ohma.
Claims 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Tanaka in view of Knapp.
Claims 21 and 22 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Kurawaki in view of Knapp.
The rejections are explained in the Examiner's Answer.
The opposing viewpoints of the appellants are set forth in
the Brief.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007