Ex parte KURAWAKI et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-2475                                                          
          Application 08/319,473                                                      


               The rejection of claims 1 and 2 through 15 as being clearly            
          anticipated by Tanaka is not sustained.                                     
               The rejection of claims 1 and 2 through 15 as being clearly            
          anticipated by Kurawaki is not sustained.                                   
               The rejection of claims 16 through 20 as being unpatentable            
          over Tanaka in view of Ohma is not sustained.                               
               The rejection of claims 16 through 20 as being unpatentable            
          over Kurawaki in view of Ohma is not sustained.                             
               The rejection of claims 21 and 22 as being unpatentable over           
          Tanaka in view of Knapp is sustained.                                       







               The rejection of claims 21 and 22 as being unpatentable over           
          Kurawaki in view of Knapp is sustained.                                     
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                      
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                   
          1.136(a).                                                                   
                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    



                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007