Appeal No. 96-2475
Application 08/319,473
The rejection of claims 1 and 2 through 15 as being clearly
anticipated by Tanaka is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 1 and 2 through 15 as being clearly
anticipated by Kurawaki is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 16 through 20 as being unpatentable
over Tanaka in view of Ohma is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 16 through 20 as being unpatentable
over Kurawaki in view of Ohma is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 21 and 22 as being unpatentable over
Tanaka in view of Knapp is sustained.
The rejection of claims 21 and 22 as being unpatentable over
Kurawaki in view of Knapp is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007