Appeal No. 96-2551 Application 08/037,767 prior to the application of the first AC "pulse" to the primary winding of the transformer, resistor 54 is unable to transfer charge to or from either of the two capacitors. For this reason, the rejection of claim 10 is reversed. The rejection of claim 15, which like claim 10 requires "precharging" to occur prior to application of the first pulse to the primary winding of the transformer, is reversed for the same reason. It is also reversed for an additional reason argued by appellant (Br. at 18), which is that the final Office action fails to address the claimed "means . . . for detecting an overcurrent condition in the power transistor wherein the third controlled switch is responsive to such overcurrent detection to turn off the power transistor." Nor was this limitation addressed in the Answer, which improperly treats claim 15 as standing or falling with claim 10 (Answer at 10) even though it is separately argued in the brief. For the foregoing reasons, the § 102(b) rejection of claims 10 and 15 is reversed. REVERSED -14-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007