Ex parte A'COSTA - Page 3




                Appeal No. 96-3021                                                                                                            
                Application 08/104,452                                                                                                        



                (Norwegian Patent)2                                                                                                           

                Ester                            2,083,894       Mar. 31, 1982                                                                
                (Published British Application)                                                                                               


                                 Also relied upon by the examiner is the admitted prior                                                       
                art found in appellant’s specification at page 2, lines 3-18, and                                                             
                a dictionary definition of “shotgun” found in the Glossary of                                                                 
                Ordnance Terms, June 1959, Walker W. Holler, Editor.  That                                                                    
                definition indicates that a “shotgun” is a “smooth-bore shoulder                                                              
                weapon.”                                                                                                                      


                                 Claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                          
                § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cox.                                                                                         


                                 Claims 1 through 3, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35                                                          
                U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sargeant in view of Hoie.                                                             


                                 Claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 7 stand rejected under                                                      
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Hawley.                                                                            

                         2Our understanding of this foreign language document is                                                              
                based upon a translation prepared for the U.S. Patent and                                                                     
                Trademark Office.  A copy of that translation accompanies                                                                     
                this decision.                                                                                                                
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007