Appeal No. 96-3374 Application No. 08/115,974 open porosity and are impregnated with a solid film lubricant, the solid film lubricant has an affinity for oil and promotes rapid formation of a stable oil film to reduce friction therebetween" is not taught or suggested by the applied prior art. New grounds of rejection Inasmuch as the basic thrust of our affirmance of the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections of claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 12 differs from the rationale advanced by the examiner for the rejection, we hereby designate the affirmance to be new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) to allow the appellants a fair opportunity to react thereto (see In re Kronig, 539 F.2d 1300, 1302-03, 190 USPQ 425, 426-27 (CCPA 1976)). CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed, with the affirmance constituting new grounds of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b) and the decision of the 18Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007