THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte DEWEY T. HOLLAND ________________ Appeal No. 96-3833 Application 08/014,3201 ________________ HEARD: June 11, 1997 ________________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and COHEN AND LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judges. McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s rejection of claims 32 through 37 and 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. All of the other claims in the application have either been canceled or have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. 1Application for patent filed February 5, 1993. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007