THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEENAN LONGCOR and MARC HAYMAN
____________
Appeal No. 97-0032
Application No. 08/095,2951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SCHAFER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PER CURIAM
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 21 through 36, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed July 21, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/973,306, filed November 9, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007